Sunday, September 27, 2015

RDA - Production Publication Distribution Manufacture Date - MARC 264

RDA - Production Publication Distribution Manufacture Date - MARC 264

MARC field 264 (formerly known as the publication, distribution, field in AACR2) is the home for many different RDA elements.  MARC field 264 will replace field 260 so that each of the different types can be coded explicitly. We will talk about the following areas:

  • Production statement (2.7)
  • Publication statement (2.8)
  • Distribution statement (2.9)
  • Manufacture statement (2.10)
  • Copyright date (2.11)
[Source: Library of Congress]

Please note that relevant rules are available in RDA RULES-CHAPTER 2

Some popular RDA Blog posts on PUBLICATION DISTRIBUTION ETC.MARC-260MARC-264, and DATE using guidelines from RDA RULES-CHAPTER 2 are following:
Bookmark this RDA Blog post for important links to Resource Description and Access and AACR2 Cataloging Rules and Examples on PUBLICATION PRODUCTION MANUFACTURE DISTRIBUTION ETC.MARC-260MARC-264, and DATE applying guidelines from RDA RULES-CHAPTER 2 and LC-PCC PS.
  
Updated in RDA Frequently Asked Questions

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Friday, September 18, 2015

Salman Haider Author - Facebook Page

Salman Haider

I have created a Facebook Page Salman Haider Author

I am using this to share and communicate and discuss my writings on Librarianship Studies and Information Technology, Library and Information Science, Resource Description and Access - RDA, Library Cataloging, Library Classification, Subject Headings, Information Access Through The Subject, Library Management, etc. I write eight Blogs on Library and Information Science. Some of these blogs have their own Facebook Pages. If you wish to be notified of all my writings in Library and Information Science, then you should "Like" this Facebook Page, as this page is created to broadcast information about all the works of Salman Haider through one page.

I will also post here items which are not covered by RDA Blog, Librarianship Studies and Information Technology Blog, and Information Access Through The Subject Blog.

So what are you waiting for, "LIKE" THIS PAGE if you wish to be updated about my research writings on Library and Information Science and Information Technology.

I will stop sharing professional communication from my personal Facebook profile after some time; so it is better that you connect with me on Facebook by making a "Like" to my page "Salman Haider Author".

Visit https://www.facebook.com/SalmanHaiderAuthor and "Like" this page to connect to me.

You can also "communicate" with me on this page on issues and queries related to library and information science and related information technology.

Regards

Saturday, September 5, 2015

EDTF Date - 046 - RDA Cataloging Examples

Resource Description and Access RDA

RDA Cataloging Examples of use of Extended Date Time Format (EDTF) in MARC 21 field 046 for Special Coded Dates in Resource Description and Access (RDA) Name Authority Records 

DCM Z1 046 update in Cataloger's Desktop 2015 Issue 3 release

Cataloger's Desktop 2015 Issue 3 was released on August 11, 2015. This release includes an important update to DCM Z1 instruction sheet 046, Special Coded Dates. 


LC/NACO catalogers: please note that the formatting of dates in the 046 field has changed.


When supplying dates in field 046, use the Extended Date Time Format (EDTF) schema in all cases except for centuries; supply dates using the pattern yyyy, yyyy-mm, or yyyy-mm-dd; always add subfield $2 edtf except after a century. The more consistent use of $2 edtf is based on a PCCLIST discussion suggestion to simplify the use of $2 (always use except for centuries).

Examples:

046 ## $f 1884-10-11$g 1962-11-07 $2 edtf

046 ## $s -0199~ $2 edtf

046 ## $f 1946-06 $2 edtf

046 ## $f 1960 $2 edtf

But:

046 ## $s 20 

046 fields in existing name authority records will be reformatted to conform to the new DCM Z1 guidelines during the Phase 3B changes to the LC/NACO Authority File.

The examples in LC-PCC PS 9.3.1.3 (Recording Dates Associated with Persons) will be updated in the October 2015 RDA Toolkit update.

Source: Paul Frank, Acting Coordinator, NACO and SACO Programs, Cooperative Programs Section, Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division, Library of Congress.

Question by Robert Bratton, Cataloging Librarian, The George Washington University, Washington D.C.

Should we format all encoded dates in authority records the same way?

Example:

373  George Washington University. $2 naf ǂs 2006-07-01

Answer by Paul Frank

This formatting only applies to the 046 field of authority records, since subfield $2 in the 046 field can accommodate the EDTF source code. In other fields of authority records, subfield $2 applies to the term(s) in subfield $a (and subfield $b, $c, etc. in the case of the 370 field), but not to the date(s) in subfields $s or $t.

Source: Based on information from PCCLIST, Library of Congress, RDA Toolkit.

EDTF Date in MARC 21 Field 046 - RDA Cataloging Examples


046 $f 1947? $2 edtf

046 $f 19uu-02-15 $2 edtf

046 1902? = 046 _ _ $s 1902? $2 edtf 

046 Approximately 1902 = 046 _ _ $s 1902~ $2 edtf

046 Either 1901 and 1902 = 046 _ _ $s [1901,1902] $2 edtf



Date
  • 2001-02-03
    year, month, day
  • 2008-12
    year, month
  • 2008
    year
  • -0999
    a negative year
  • 0000
    year zero
Date and Time
  • 2001-02-03T09:30:01
  • 2004-01-01T10:10:10Z
  • 2004-01-01T10:10:10+05:00
Interval (start/end)
  • 1964/2008
    An interval beginning sometime in 1964 and ending sometime in 2008. Year precision.
  • 2004-06/2006-08
    An interval beginning sometime in June 2004 and ending sometime in August of 2006. Month precision.
  • 2004-02-01/2005-02-08
    An interval beginning sometime on February 1, 2004 and ending sometime on February 8, 2005. Day precision.
  • 2004-02-01/2005-02
    An interval beginning sometime on February 1, 2004 and ending sometime in February 2005. The precision of the interval is not defined; the start endpoint has day precision and the end endpoint has month precision.
  • 2004-02-01/2005
    An interval beginning sometime on February 1, 2004 and ending sometime in 2005. The start endpoint has day precision and the end endpoint has year precision.
  • 2005/2006-02
    An interval beginning sometime in 2005 and ending sometime in February 2006.
Uncertain/Approximate
  • 1984?
    uncertain: possibly the year 1984, but not definitely
  • 2004-06?
  • 2004-06-11?
  • 1984~
    "approximately" the year 1984
  • 1984?~
    the year is approximately 1984 and even that is uncertain
Unspecified
  • 199u
    some unspecified year in the 1990s.
  • 19uu
    some unspecified year in the 1900s.
  • 1999-uu
    some month in 1999
  • 1999-01-uu
    some day in January 1999
  • 1999-uu-uu
    some day in 1999
Partial Uncertain/ Approximate
  • 2004?-06-11
    uncertain year; month, day known
  • 2004-06~-11
    year and month are approximate; day known
  • 2004-(06)?-11
    uncertain month, year and day known
  • 2004-06-(11)~
    day is approximate; year, month known
  • 2004-(06)?~
    Year known, month within year is approximate and uncertain
  • 2004-(06-11)?
    Year known, month and day uncertain
  • 2004?-06-(11)~
    Year uncertain, month known, day approximate
  • (2004-(06)~)?
    Year uncertain and month is both uncertain and approximate
  • 2004?-(06)?~
    This has the same meaning as the previous example.
  • (2004)?-06-04~
    Year uncertain, month and day approximate.
  • (2011)-06-04~
    Year known, month and day approximate. Note that this has the same meaning as the following.
  • 2011-(06-04)~
    Year known, month and day approximate.
  • 2011-23~
    Approximate season (around Autumn 2011)
Partial Unspecified
  • 156u-12-25
    December 25 sometime during the 1560s
  • 15uu-12-25
    December 25 sometime during the 1500s
  • 15uu-12-uu
  • 1560-uu-25
    Year and day of month specified, month unspecified
One of a Set
  • [1667,1668, 1670..1672]
    One of the years 1667, 1668, 1670, 1671, 1672
  • [..1760-12-03]
    December 3, 1760 or some earlier date
  • [1760-12..]
    December 1760 or some later month
  • [1760-01, 1760-02, 1760-12..]
    January or February of 1760 or December 1760 or some later month
  • [1667, 1760-12]
    Either the year 1667 or the month December of 1760.
Multiple Dates
  • {1667,1668, 1670..1672}
    All of the years 1667, 1668, 1670, 1671, 1672
  • {1960, 1961-12}
    The year 1960 and the month December of 1961.

Examples from Library of Congress Authorities

046 $f [1931,1932] $2 edtf
[100 1# $a Kohalī, Droṇavīra, $d 1931 or 1932-]

046 $f 1428~ $2 edtf
[100 0# $a Bāvā Jitto, $d approximately 1428-]

046 $f 1253~ $g 1325 $2 edtf
[100 0# $a Amīr Khusraw Dihlavī, ‡d approximately 1253-1325]


Comments by RDA Blog users / Experts / Catalogers:
  • Aaron Kuperman, Law Cataloger, United States: RDA should be understood as being continually updated, as opposed to AACR and earlier codes which came out with new editions once a generation (if that often).

See also in RDA Blog:

Please provide us your valuable feedback in the RDA Blog Guest Book to make RDA Blog a better place for information on Resource Description and Access (RDA). You can also suggest edits/additions to this RDA Blog post. 

Author: Salman Haider [Revised 2015-09-05 | Written 2015-09-05]

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Friday, September 4, 2015

Subject Heading : Glossary of Library & Information Science

Subject Heading : Glossary of Library & Information Science

http://librarianshipstudies.blogspot.com/2015/09/subject-heading-glossary-library.html
New Post on Librarianship Studies & Information Technology Blog provides a comprehensive definition of Subject Heading.
This new encyclopedic entry in the “Glossary of Library & Information Science” of the “Librarianship Studies & Information Technology” blog answers following questions?

What is Subject Heading?
What Subject Heading does?
Where Subject Heading is applied?
What is vocabulary control and why is it important?
How Subject Heading assist library users and staff?
What are the alternatives to Subject Heading?
What are the popular Subject Heading Lists?
Librarianship Studies & Information Technology Blog will be more focused on the techniques of Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) by use of Classification & Shelflisting Manual (CSM) and Subject Headings Manual (SHM) and Classification Web tool of Library of Congress, and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Follow Librarianship Studies & Information Technology in Social Media blog to be updated of new items and start/comment on the discussions in the Google+ Community Librarianship Studies & Information Technology and Facebook Group Librarianship Studies & Information Technology.

Saturday, August 22, 2015

RDA LC-PCC PS Revision

Resource Description and Access RDA

RDA Toolkit Update, August 11, 2015 - Changes in Resource Description and Access (RDA) and Library of Congress - Program for Cooperative Cataloging Policy Statements (LC-PCC PS) and RDA Toolkit

TOPIC 1: Changes in RDA Content
TOPIC 2: Change in Content in LC-PCC PSs
TOPIC 3: Functional Changes in the RDA Toolkit

TOPIC 1: Changes in RDA Content : Fast Track changes

The PDF file mentioned in the URL below from RDA JSC site identifies the "Fast Track" changes to RDA that will be included in this release (6JSC-Sec-16.pdf); Fast Track changes are not added to the RDA Update History.  While you are encouraged to peruse the changes, there are no significant changes.

TOPIC 2: Change in Content in LC-PCC PSs

A summary of LC-PCC PS updates incorporated in this release is available at August 11, 2015 release of the RDA Toolkit.  Catalogers should review the following policy statements:

1.8.2, First Alternative:  revised to include an exception for Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Perso-Arabic, Cyrillic, and Greek catalogers to substitute Western-style arabic numerals when numbers are found in non-Latin scripts.  For Hebrew script catalogers, also note changes to the options at 2.6.3.3 and similar instructions for adding Gregorian date when a date in the Hebrew script is being recorded.

1.8.2, Second Alternative: the LC practice for supplying equivalent numbers has been revised; LC catalogers may now supply such equivalents (e.g., a date in arabic numerals when roman numerals are on the resource) if considered important.

2.12.1.2, 2.12.9.2: At the request of the PCC Series Policy Task Group, the instructions for sources of series statements and series numbering have been revised with respect to information transcribed from “sources within the resource”.

6.27.1.9, 6.28.1.2, 6.28.1.10:  Information on authorized access points for librettos has been revised in consultation with the Music Library Association.

11.3.2.3, 11.13.1.8.1:  A new policy statement has been developed for those cases when it is not feasible to record *all* locations of a conference, etc. (more common for certain types of sporting events).  The statement allows for recording an applicable larger place (or places), or a single place primarily associated with the conference, etc., (e.g., a host city).

TOPIC 3: Functional Changes in the RDA Toolkit

There are no functional changes in the RDA Toolkit in this release.
The next planned release of the RDA Toolkit will be in October 2015.

Source: Library of Congress

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Friday, August 21, 2015

LCSH - Subject Headings Manual (SHM) H 202 and H 203 Revised

Note: Subject Headings Manual (SHM) provides guidelines to use Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). The manual was originally conceived as an in-house procedure manual addressed to cataloging staff at the Library of Congress. From the very beginning, however, the manual included not only procedures and practices to be followed by LC catalogers but also substantive explanations of subject cataloging policy. Other libraries who wish to catalog in the same manner as the Library of Congress as well as faculty at schools of library science who wish to teach Library of Congress subject cataloging policies to their students should follow the guidelines of the Subject Headings Manual (SHM).
Librarianship Studies & Information Technology Blog will be more focused on the techniques of Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) by use of Classification & Shelflisting Manual (CSM) and Subject Headings Manual (SHM) and Classification Web tool of Library of Congress, and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Follow Librarianship Studies & Information Technology in Social Media blog to be updated of new items and start/comment on the discussions in the Google+ Community Librarianship Studies & Information Technology and Facebook Group Librarianship Studies & Information Technology.

Sunday, August 16, 2015

RDA Bibliography

RDA Bibliography




Articles
Books

Presentations

Videos

A New Video Series from The Library of Congress: “Conversations About RDA” : The Library of Congress has just released online, “Conversations About RDA”, a new series of five training videos providing, “tips and strategies for working with the RDA.” The videos were recorded on May 20, 2015.


Format of bibliographic description here is similar to description on Bibliography Page of RDA Bibliography: Title. Author/Editor/Compiler. Year. Publisher/Journal. Pages/Volume/Issue/Slides/Minutes. Place.

This is a compilation from Google Alerts and other sources and searches. Check complete compilation so far in the Bibliography Page of RDA Bibliography containing Articles, Books, Presentations, Thesis, and Videos on Resource Description and Access (RDA) in a spreadsheet view as shown below:

RDA Bibliography

[RDA Bibliography is a partner-blog of RDA Blog]

Please suggest new resources to be included in the RDA Bibliography through the form available on About RDA Bibliography Page. 

Please provide us your valuable feedback in the RDA Blog Guest Book about RDA Bibliography. Select "RDA Bibliography" from the drop-down option in the "Choose a Blog" part of the form.



Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Saturday, August 8, 2015

Follow Librarianship Studies & Information Technology

Librarianship Studies & Information Technology


Librarianship Studies & Information Technology (LS & IT) is a blog on studies, research, techniques, technology, best practices, and latest news on librarianship, library and information science, and information technology. Whether you are studying, doing research, or a working professional, this is the place for you... For Librarians, i-School Master of Library and Information Science (MLIS) & Ph.D Students & Researchers and IT Professionals.


Wednesday, August 5, 2015

Classification : Glossary of Library & Information Science

Library Classification


Classification : Glossary of Library & Information Science

New Post on Librarianship Studies & Information Technology Blog provides a comprehensive definition of Classification or Library Classification or Book Classification or Bibliographic Classification.
This new encyclopedic entry in the Glossary of Library & Information Science of the Librarianship Studies & Information Technology Blog answers following questions?
What is classification?
What classification does?
Where classification in applied in a library setting?
How is library classification different from knowledge classification and scientific classification?
What is the structure of classification systems?
What is significance of notation in classification?
How classification assist library users and staff?
What are the alternative approaches to provide subject access to library patrons besides classification?
What are the popular library classification systems?
What are the new trends in the application of library classification?
ExcerptClassification or Library Classification or Book Classification or Bibliographic Classification is the process of arranging, grouping, coding, and organizing books and other library materials (e.g. serials, sound recordings, moving images, cartographic materials, manuscripts, computer files, e-resources etc.) on shelves or entries of a catalog, bibliography, and index according to their subject in a systematic, logical, and helpful order by way of assigning them call numbers using a library classification system, so that users can find them as quickly and easily as possible. Read complete definition of Classification>>

Friday, July 31, 2015

Numbering of Serials in RDA Cataloging

Resource Description & Access (RDA)

Numbering of Serials

  • Numeric and/or alphabetic designation of first issue or part of sequence, chronological designation of first issue or part of sequence, numeric and/or alphabetic designation of last issue or part of sequence, and chronological designation of last issue or part of sequence are CORE ELEMENTS. Other numbering is optional.
P         Look at instruction 2.6.1

Numbering of serials is the identification of each of the issues or part of a serial. It may include a numeral, a letter, a character, or the combination of these with or without an accompanying caption (volume, number, etc.) and/or a chronological designation (RDA 2.6.2-2.6.5).

Recording Numbering of Serials
  • Record numbers expressed as numerals or as words applying the general guidelines given under 1.8. Transcribe other words, characters, or groups of words and/or characters as they appear on the source of information. Apply the general guidelines on transcription given under 1.7.  Substitute a slash for a hyphen, as necessary, for clarity.
  • Record the number for the first issue; if it has ceased publication, record the last issue
  • If the numbering starts a new sequence with a different system, record the numbering of the first issue of each sequence and the numbering of the last issue of each sequence.
Examples:
362 0# $a Volume X, number 1-          (formatted style)
362 1# $a Began with January 2010 issue (unformatted style) 


[Source: Library of Congress]

<<<<<---------->>>>>

Comments:


Aaron Kuperman The biggest problem with serials is that the "oral traditions" of serial catalogers are such that even when a work clearly has a single creator (and should get a 100 entry), and is cited that way in reference sources and by users of the catalog, the serial catalogers insist the person is a mere editor and therefore a contributor (only a 700 entry) -- and as more on more monographs are being cataloged as serials/continuing resources, we are losing access to the most important access point (n.b. Cutter's first rule that the catalog needs to provide access to works by the name of the author). Under RDA, serial catalogers should make 100 heading entries for author who create the work - which is what RDA says to do, and which they don't.
[Aaron Kuperman is a Law cataloger at Library of Congress, Washington D.C.]

<<<<<-----Revised 2015-07-31----->>>>>

[This RDA Blog post is best viewed in Google Chrome web browser]


Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Inaccuracies in RDA

Please see Inaccuracies [RDA Blog post revised with Question & Answer on 2015-07-28]

Resource Description & Access (RDA)

Please provide your comments on this interpretations of RDA Rules, as mentioned in the Question & Answer part of this RDA Blog post.

<<<<<---------->>>>>
Comments:

Comment by Bob Kosovsky, Curataor, Rare Books and Manuscripts, Music Division, The New York Public Library, New York, United States:
Bob Kosovsky Oh! I thought it was about things wrong in RDA. Rather, it's about how to deal with inaccuracies in cataloging materials. smile emoticon

<<<<<-----Revised 2016-01-18----->>>>>

See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):