Thursday, January 8, 2015

245 - Title Statement - MARC21

245 - Title Statement (Non Repeatable)

Title and statement of responsibility area of the bibliographic description of a work.

Title proper is the chief name of a resource.  It is the focus for identifying the preferred source of information.  An alternative title is treated as part of the title proper.  The title proper excludes any parallel titles proper, other title information, and parallel other title information. 

Field 245 contains the title, other title information and statement of responsibility, as well as the numerical designation of a part or section and the name of a part or section. The title is recorded exactly as to wording, spelling and diacritical marks, but not necessarily as to order and punctuation.

Source of Information

If the information does not appear on a source forming part of the resource itself, take it from one of the following sources (in order of preference):
a)      accompanying material (e.g., a leaflet, an “about” file)
b)      a container that is not issued as part of the resource itself (e.g., a box, case made by the owner)
c)      other published descriptions of the resource
d)     any other available source (e.g., a reference source)

In RDA when there is no title provided within the resource itself, it may be taken from an external source with the appropriate note added. A statement of responsibility appearing in any area of the resource may be transcribed. Information from outside of the resource may be included, enclosed in square brackets.

In AACR2 the chief source of information is the title page. If there is no title page, use the part of the item supplying the most complete information, whether this is the cover (excluding a book jacket), half title page, caption, colophon, running title or other part. If information traditionally given on the title page is given on facing pages without repetition or with only partial repetition, consider these pages together as the chief source. Do not combine separate title pages or added title pages. When no statement of responsibility is given on the chief source, but information appears prominently on the title page verso, pages preceding the title page, or cover, the information is transcribed as remainder of title and enclosed in square brackets.

First Indicator: Title added entry
0 - No added entry 
1 - Added entry 

1st Indicator
Title added entry. A value that specifies whether a title access point is made.
 
0 - No added entry. No title access point is made. Value 0 is used when field 1xx is not present in the record.

245 0 0 [Man smoking at window].
245 0 3 Le bureau = ‡b La Oficina = Das Büro.
 
1 - Added entry. A title access point is made. Value 1 is used only when field 1xx is present in the record.

245 1 0 Cancer research : ‡b official organ of the American Association for Cancer Research Inc.
245 1 0 [Nocturne, dance house].
245 1 0 Statistics : ‡b facts or fiction.

Second Indicator: Nonfiling characters
0 - No nonfiling characters 
1-9 - Number of nonfiling characters 

2nd Indicator
Nonfiling characters. The number of character positions associated with a definite or indefinite article (e.g., An, Le, or The) at the beginning of a title that are disregarded in sorting and filing processes.
 
0 - No nonfiling characters. No initial article character positions are disregarded. Use value 0 if the title does not begin with an article.

245 1 0 Harvard project manager.
245 1 0 War of the worlds : ‡b a graphic novel adapted from the classic tale of an alien invasion by H.G. Wells / ‡c written by Stephen Stern ; illustrated by Arne Starr ; lettering and special effects, Dane Cote ; art production, Bill Maus.
245 0 0 A to Z drug facts / ‡c [editor, David S. Tatro ; assistant editor, Lawrence R. Borgsdorf].
Diacritical marks or special characters at the beginning of a title field that does not begin with an initial article are not counted as nonfiling characters.

245 0 0 [Diary].
245 1 0 ... as others see us ... : ‡b for mixed ensemble / ‡c James MacMillan.


1-9 - Number of nonfiling characters present. A non-zero value indicates that a title begins with a definite or indefinite article that is disregarded in sorting and indexing processes. Any diacritical mark, space, mark of punctuation associated with the article, and any space or mark of punctuation preceding the first filing character is included in the count of nonfiling characters.

Any diacritic or special character associated with the first filing character is not included in the count of nonfiling characters.

245 0 4 The year book of medicine.
245 0 5 [The part of Pennsylvania that lies between the forks of the Susquehannah, divided into townships].
245 1 2 A report to the legislature for the year...
245 1 2 L'enfant criminel / ‡c Pierre Bellemare, Jean-François Nahmias ; avec la collaboration de Jacqueline Hiégel.
245 1 2 L'été / ‡c Nick Winnick.
245 1 3 An A-Z of employment law : ‡b a complete reference source for managers / ‡c Peter Chandler.
245 1 5 The "winter mind" : ‡b William Bronk and American letters / ‡c Burt Kimmelman.
245 1 5 "The eye that never sleeps" : ‡b a history of the Pinkerton National Detective Agency / ‡c Frank Morn.
245 1 8 ... the serpent-snapping eye : ‡b trumpet, percussion, piano, and 4-channel computer-synthesized sound / ‡c Roger Reynolds.
245 1 8 The ... annual report to the Governor.

Subfield Codes
$a - Title (NR) 
$b - Remainder of title (NR) 
$c - Statement of responsibility, etc. (NR) 
$f - Inclusive dates (NR) 
$g - Bulk dates (NR) 
$h - Medium (NR)
$k - Form (R) 
$n - Number of part/section of a work (R) 
$p - Name of part/section of a work (R) 
$s - Version (NR) 
$6 - Linkage (NR) 
$8 - Field link and sequence number (R)

‡a Title - The title proper and alternative title, excluding the designation of the number or name of a part. Use also for the first title of separate works (by the same or different authors/composers) in a collection lacking a collective title.

‡b Remainder of title - The remainder of the title information. The data includes parallel titles, titles subsequent to the first (in terms lacking a collective title), and other title information. Do not repeat subfield ‡b when more than one parallel title, subsequent title, and/or other title information is given in the field.

‡c Statement of responsibility, etc.  - The first statement of responsibility and/or remaining data in the field that has not been coded in one of the other subfields. Once subfield ‡c has been recorded, no further subfield coding of field 245 is possible.

‡n Number of part/section of a work - The number designation for a part/section of a work used in a title. Numbering is defined as an indication of sequencing in any form (e.g., Book two, Part 1, or Supplement A). Multiple numberings for a part/section are contained in a single subfield ‡n. Separate multiple numberings with a comma. In music titles, the serial, opus, or thematic index numbers are generally not contained in subfield ‡n.

‡p Name of part/section of a work - A name designation of a part/section of a work.
In records formulated according to ISBD principles, subfield ‡p follows a period ( . ) when it is preceded by subfield ‡a, subfield ‡b, or another subfield ‡p. Subfield ‡p follows a comma ( , ) when it follows subfield ‡n.

Examples:

      AACR2 record for a monograph:
            245 $a Teusday’s [i.e. Tuesday’s] tasks
      RDA record for this monograph:
            245 $a Teusday’s tasks
      246 $i Corrected title: $a Tuesday’s tasks

      RDA record for a serial:
            245 $a Zoology studies
      246 $i Misspelled title on number 1: $a Zooology studies 

245    12    L'enfant ...
245    14    The flowers of India
245    10    Library and information science education
245    12    L'éte
245    10    --as others see us
245    16    --the serpent--snapping eye

Source reads:               Dr. Logan Carroll, Harvard Medical School
RDA/LCPS say:         245 … / $c Dr. Logan Carroll, Harvard Medical School.
RDA allows:               245 … / $c Dr. Logan Carroll.

AACR2:                      245 $a … / $c by Susan Brown … [et al.].
RDA allows:               245 $a … / $c by Susan Brown [and four others].
RDA/LCPS say:         245 $a … / $c by Susan Brown, Melanie Carlson, Stephen Lindell, Kevin Ott, and Janet Wilson.

245   10   Love... in Tokyo

See also:




Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Resource Description & Access (RDA) & RDA Blog History Timeline

Resource Description & Access (RDA) History


Important Dates in the History and Development of Resource Description & Access (RDA). 
  • Click on the + sign to expand the timeline as shown by the arrow. 
  • RDA History Timeline can also be viewed in a Flipbook or List format as shown by the arrows. 
  • Click on each item to view detailed description and sources of information, photos, videos.

Contribute in the further development of this RDA History Timeline by suggesting important dates in the history of RDA and RDA implementation in libraries around the world. For example you can suggest a date when your library implemented RDA Cataloging, or any date which is important to be noted in the Resource Description & Access (RDA) History. Suggestions should by accompanied with proper reference sources, from which the information could be verified/cited.

If you like it, then show it with your Likes, +1, Tweets, and shares.


Friday, December 26, 2014

Parallel Titles in RDA, AACR2 Cataloging & MARC21

Parallel Titles RDA AACR2 MARC21 Cataloging



  • Questions and Answers on treatment Parallel Titles in RDA, AACR2 and MARC21 in Google+ Community RDA Cataloging
  • Join the Google+ Community RDA Cataloging to view, ask, and share information and issues related to Resource Description & Access (RDA) and AACR2 Cataloging

See also following Resource Description & Access (RDA) Blog posts:


<<<<<---------->>>>>







Aaron Kuperman
Yesterday 10:55 PM
+
1
0
1
 
 
At LC, and this is very important for records of works in non-Roman scripts, if there is a parallel title (typically in English or another Latin script langauge) anywhere in the item being cataloged, it ends up both as a parallel title (245, following an "="), and usually as a 246 , often with a $i indicating where the parallel title came from, such as the verso t.p., added title page, the collophon, or whereever.  In the past the 246 would have sufficient if the Roman script title was not on the title page.


Saturday, December 20, 2014

Correct Coding of ISBN in MARC21 field 020 in RDA & AACR2 Cataloging with Examples



Several years ago the definition of $z of the 020 (International Standard Book Identifier) was expanded—it is now used for “structurally invalid” ISBNs (those that are too short, too long, wrong check digit, etc.) and also for “application invalid” ISBNs (ISBNs for a manifestation that would be described in a different bibliographic record).

The LC-PCC Policy Statement for 2.15.1.7 provides the following instruction:  
Record ISBNs in $z (Canceled/invalid) of MARC field 020 if they clearly represent a different manifestation from the resource being cataloged and would require a separate record (e.g., an ISBN for the large print version, e-book, or teacher’s manual on the record for a regular trade publication). If separate records would not be made (e.g., most cases where ISBNs are given for both the hardback and paperback simultaneously), or in cases of doubt, record the ISBNs in $a (International Standard Book Number) of MARC field 020

Please remember to use $z for ISBNs when appropriate. For regular print publications, this is most likely to occur when you also have an ISBN for a large print edition or e-book that would be cataloged on a separate record.

When we do not use the correct subfield code in field 020, systems that receive records from LC may incorrectly merge or replace records for the wrong format—we have received several complaints about this, and we hope we can improve the situation with your help.

[Source: Dave Reser, Library of Congress, Policy and Standards Division] 

<<<<<---------->>>>>

RESOURCE DESCRIPTION & ACCESS RDA


Question: Record ISBNs in 020 $z if they represent a different manifestation from the resource being cataloged.

  • If a printed monograph presents different ISBNs for different manifestation, do we have to transcribe them like below given example?


AACR2            020 $a 9780415692847 (hardback: alk. paper)
                                        020 $a 9780203116852 (e-book)

RDA                020 $a 9780415692847 (hardback: alk. paper)
                                      020 $z 9780203116852 (e-book)   (recorded in $z ISBN clearly representing an e-book version of the same manifestation)

Answer: Yes, the example you have given shows LC’s practice documented in LC PCC PS 2.15.1.7 for multiple ISBN:

“…if they clearly represent a different manifestation from the resource being cataloged and would require a separate record (e.g., an ISBN for the large print version, e-book, or teacher’s manual on the record for a regular trade publication). If separate records would not be made (e.g., most cases where ISBNs are given for both the hardback and paperback simultaneously), or in cases of doubt, record the ISBNs in $a”

<<<<<---------->>>>>


See Also: RDA Blog Labels (Categories) in below links for posts on related information on treatment of ISBN in RDA.


<<<<<---------->>>>>









David Bigwood

12 hours ago  -  Shared publicly
While not part of the question and answer it would be nice to show subfield q being used. 


RDA                020 $a 9780415692847 $q (hardback: alk. paper)

                                      020 $z 9780203116852 $q (e-book) 



<<<<<---------->>>>>










Sasha Birman
Yesterday 4:29 PM
+
1
0
1
 
Reply

We use both fields, 440 is former series field. 490 is very current.







<<<<<---------->>>>>


Sasha Birman
Yesterday 4:29 PM

We use both fields, 440 is former series field. 490 is very current.

                           <<<<<---------->>>>>



See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Friday, November 21, 2014

RDA Tookit Release (October 14, 2014) : Changes in and Revision of Resource Description & Access and LC-PCC PS

A new release of the RDA Toolkit was published on Tuesday, October 14.  This message will cover several points you should be aware of related to the release. 

TOPIC 1: Changes in RDA Content
TOPIC 2: Change in Content in LC-PCC PSs
TOPIC 3: Additional Content in the RDA Toolkit

TOPIC 1: Changes in RDA Content

This update only contains  “Fast Track” changes that are relatively minor (these are not flagged in the RDA text with revision history icons).  The linked file 6JSC-Sec-13.pdf contains a complete listing of the Fast Track changes. You’ll note that many of the changes are to examples, including moving some examples to more appropriate instructions, replacing some examples, and adding initial articles to some preferred and variant titles, etc.—note that the addition of the initial articles are intended to exhibit the base instruction at RDA 6.2.1.7, and that LC/PCC practice is to  OMIT initial articles (per 6.1.2.7, Alternative, etc.), so do not interpret the revised examples as a policy change.
RDA RELATIONSHIP DESIGNATORS
RDA RELATIONSHIP DESIGNATORS

There are also some new and revised relationship designators for use in Appendices I, J, and K including these:

book artist
letterer
graphic novelization of (work)   Reciprocal relationship: adapted as graphic novel (work)
adapted as libretto (work)  [replaces basis for libretto (work)]
adapted as novel (work)  [replaces novelization (work)]
adapted in verse as (work)  [replaces verse adaptation (work)]
digested as (work)  [replaces digest (work)]
modified by variation as (work)  [replaces musical variations (work)]

TOPIC 2: Change in Content in LC-PCC PSs

A summary of LC-PCC PS updates incorporated in this release is linked (LCPCCPS_changes_2014_October.doc).  The changes are fairly minor, except for some revisions/new statements requested by the music cataloging community (e.g., 6.15.1.7, 6.18.1.4, 6.28.1.9.1, Alternative).  Some information previously held only in the Descriptive Cataloging Manual section Z1 has moved to policy statements (e.g., 9.16.1.3, 9.19.1.5 for profession and/or occupation). Another minor change is related to, well,  “minor changes”!  The PS for 11.2.2.5 introduces a new category for minor changes to corporate body names--the addition, omission, or fluctuation of a frequency word(e.g., annual, biennial) in a conference name.

TOPIC 3: Additional Content in the RDA Toolkit

This release will include the addition of British Library Policy Statements (BL PS). The BL PS icons will be set to display in the RDA text by default, but the links can be turned off in the Toolkit Settings portion of the My Profile page (if you have created your own profile).

The documents attached to this email may also be found on the Web:
[Source: Dave Reser, LC PSD]

[Note: Above message was addressed to Library of Congress catalogers, but it is also a good source for other libraries and cataloging librarians as well]



See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Thursday, October 30, 2014

RDA Blog Reaches 200000 Pageviews

Thanks all for your love, support and suggestions. Please post your feedback and comments on RDA Blog Guest Book. Select remarks will be posted on RDA Blog Testimonials page.

INTRODUCTION TO RDA BLOG:

RDA Blog is a blog on Resource Description and Access (RDA), a new library cataloging standard that provides instructions and guidelines on formulating data for resource description and discovery, organized based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), intended for use by libraries and other cultural organizations replacing Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (AACR2). RDA Blog lists description and links to resources on Resource Description & Access (RDA). It is an attempt to bring together at one place all the useful and important information, rules, references, news, and links on Resource Description and AccessFRBRFRADFRSADMARC standardsAACR2BIBFRAME, and other items related to current developments and trends in library cataloging practice.

Author: Salman Haider

RDA BLOG HIGHLIGHTS IN 1-MINUTE VIDEO PRESENTATION

RDA Blog HistoryRDA Blog is the first and oldest blog exclusively devoted to Resource Description and Access  (RDA). RDA Blog was created by Salman Haider, a Cataloging & Metadata Librarian Blogger & Online Social Media Expert from India. RDA Blog embarked on its journey to provide useful information about Resource Description and Access (RDA) in August 2011. It received good response from librarians, catalogers, and library professionals from all around the world. It is interesting to note that the first hundred thousand pageviews to RDA Blog came in 3 years, but it took just 8 months to reach another hundred thousand pageviews. At present it is viewed at a rate of fifteen to twenty thousand times per month. RDA Blog is widely followed in social media.
  RDA Blog also made it to the list of useful resources of following:

Monday, October 27, 2014

RDA QUIZ : question on International Cataloging Principles (ICP) by IFLA








Post your vote by this Friday. You can also add your input in the comments box...
Correct answer will be declared on the weekend... and a post will be created with further explanations and interesting comments by the users on RDA Blog


See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):