Monday, October 28, 2013

MARC Code List for Relators

RDA RELATIONSHIP DESIGNATORS
RDA RELATIONSHIP DESIGNATORS

us:  MARC Code List for Relators [Also Valid as Relationship Designator in Resource Description and Access (RDA) Cataloging]

Saturday, October 26, 2013

September Update for RDA Catalogers

Dear RDA catalogers,

This message is to alert you to some information about RDA on these topics:

Topic 1.  Interim treatment of "Treaties" under RDA
Topic 2.  Reminder on formulating the preferred name and authorized access point for some types of conferences
Topic 3.  A typo in an RDA example that has the potential to confuse


Topic 1:  Interim treatment of "Treaties" under RDA.  Based on a request from the American Association of Law Libraries, the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) has approved an interim exception to the treatment of authorized access points for treaties under RDA.  The legal community is re-evaluating how authorized access points for treaties should be constructed under RDA, and has proposed some major changes to RDA that will be discussed by the Joint Steering Committee at its November meeting.  To avoid disruption within the existing NACO file and related bibliographic maintenance until RDA itself is changed, the following guidelines for new and existing authorized access points should be observed until a final solution has been determined:

New authorized access points for treaties: If no authorized access point exists for a treaty, continue to use AACR2 instructions (AACR2 25.16 Treaties, etc., and 21.35 Treaties, Intergovernmental agreements, etc.) to establish the authorized form, except, use the full form of the name of a month when necessary to record a date a treaty was signed instead of the abbreviations from AACR2. Code any new authority record as AACR2 in 008/10 (Descriptive Cataloging Rules) as an exception to the PCC Post RDA Test Guidelines.

Existing authorized access points for treaties (AACR2): Do not revise an existing AACR2 authorized access point in a name authority record for a treaty to the RDA form, continue to use the AACR2 form in RDA bibliographic records.

Existing authorized access points for treaties (RDA): Do not revise an existing RDA authorized access point in a name authority record for a treaty back to AACR2, continue to use the RDA form in bibliographic records.

These exceptions for treaties are also found in the PCC Post RDA Test Guidelines at
http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/rda/PCC%20Post%20RDA%20Test%20Guidelines.html under the heading Exception for Treaties.  LC-PCC PSs will also be issued until such time that RDA itself is changed.

Topic 2:  Reminder on formulating the preferred name and authorized access points for conferences.
A reminder that under RDA, a date that might appear with the name of a conference that is an initialsm or acronym is *not* included as part of the preferred name for the conference- the date is only used as an addition to the authorized access point for the conference ($d in the X11).  From RDA 11.2.2.11:  "Omit from the name of a conference, etc., indications of its number, or year or years of convocation, etc. Apply this instruction to the name of a congress, meeting, exhibition, fair, festival, etc. …"
This was a change from how we treated such conferences under the LCRIs for AACR2. 
Examples:

Under AACR2/LCRI:      CDVE 2011 $d (2011 : $c Hong Kong, China)
Treatment under RDA: CDVE (Conference) $n (8th : $d 2011 : $c Hong Kong, China)

Under AACR2/LCRI:       ICT-GLOW 2011 $d (2011 : $c Toulouse, France)
Treatment under RDA: ICT-GLOW (Conference) $n (1st : $d 2011 : $c Toulouse, France)

(Note that under RDA/LC-PCC PS policies, it is now possible to create separate authorities coexisting in the LC/NACO authority file for the "collective" ongoing conference and for individual instances of it, which was not permitted under AACR2/LCRI.  Note also that the term "(Conference)" or similar term is added to preferred name for a conference that is an initialism or acronym in order to convey the idea of a corporate body per LC-PCC PS 11.7.1.4 )

Topic 3.  A typo in RDA example that has the potential to confuse
Several have noted an unfortunate editing mistake in an example at RDA 9.19.1.6 showing an authorized access point using the new RDA element "Other term of rank, honour or office"-- it will be corrected in the next release (November) of the RDA Toolkit
                Wood, Captain, John
should be
                Wood, John, Captain
Please don't follow this example!


[Source: Library of Congress]

Associated Institution (Revision of RDA Rule 11.5.1.3 with Question and Answer)

RESOURCE DESCRIPTION & ACCESS RDA

Questions and Answers


Question: This recently revised instruction by which we now are to record the preferred name of the corporate body: what if the NAR for the body has not been set up yet? Must we create the NAR in order to add a 373? Or can we simply record the form as found on the resource?

or this question can be framed as below:

Question: Basically it's the form of the body given in the 373. I understand that it's supposed to be the preferred name (cf. 9.13.1.3). If the body hasn't been set up, do we have to do so, in order to use its preferred form?

Answer: No we do not have to set it up.  (same as 370)

According to RDA Rule 11.5.1.3 for Recording Associated Institutions you have to Record the name of an associated institution by using the preferred name for the institution

Friday, October 25, 2013

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) : Deities and mythological figures

ACQUISITIONS AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC ACCESS DIRECTORATE
POLICY AND STANDARDS DIVISION

SUMMARY OF DECISIONS, EDITORIAL MEETING NUMBER 8

August 19, 2013

SUBJECT HEADINGS

            Announcements

            Deities and mythological figures

                        Headings for individual deities and mythological figures (e.g., Thor, Hercules) should now be established in the name authority file using RDA instructions. The RDA heading will be valid for use as a subject heading.

            Headings for groups of deities and mythological figures (e.g., Nymphs, the Furies) will continue to be established in LCSH because they cannot currently be established with RDA instructions. The heading God and headings of the type God (name of religion) (e.g., God (Christianity)God (Greek religion)) also continue to be established in LCSH.

            The following workflows should be followed when inputting a name authority for an individual deity or mythological figure.
            If the heading is needed for subject cataloging and an LCSH heading for the deity or mythological figure already exists, catalogers may continue to assign the existing LCSH heading. In that case, do not make a name authority record.
            Optionally, catalogers may make a name authority for the deity or mythological figure if an LCSH heading already exists, but then must also make a proposal to cancel the existing LC subject heading. The proposal should be made through the Subject Proposal System; click the icon next to the heading and select the option “Propose cancelling this heading.”
            If the heading is needed for a descriptive access point, it should be input into the name authority file. LCSH should be searched to determine whether the deity or mythological figure has already been established there. If so, a proposal to cancel the subject heading must also be made. The proposal should be made through the Subject Proposal System; click the icon next to the heading and select the option “Propose cancelling this heading.” NACO libraries who do not contribute SACO proposals may email policy@loc.gov to request that PSD make the cancellation proposal for them.
            A project to transition all individual deity and mythological figure headings from LCSH to the name authority file will be conducted as resources are available. Catalogers are requested to refrain from unilaterally undertaking projects to convert the LC subject headings to name headings in a wholesale manner. Workload and staffing issues do not permit PSD to process the number of proposals that such projects would generate. SACO libraries wishing to undertake such a project may contact the Coop Section atsaco@loc.gov and the request will be considered.
            The SHM will be revised to reflect the new procedures.

See also : LC PCC-PS FOR 9.0

[Blog Post Revised 2016-01-22]

<<<<<---------->>>>>






<<<<<---------->>>>>

us: Krishna (Hindu deity) 

[new in Name Authority File]





  • URI(s)

  • Instance Of

  • Scheme Membership(s)

  • Collection Membership(s)

  • Variants

    • us: Christna (Hindu deity)
    • us: Gopal (Hindu deity)
    • us: Kr̥ṣṇa (Hindu deity)
    • us: Govinda (Hindu deity)
    • us: Mohan (Hindu deity)
    • us: Gopala (Hindu deity)
    • us: Bal Gopal (Hindu deity)
  • Variants

    • us: Christna (Hindu deity)
    • us: Gopal (Hindu deity)
    • us: Kr̥ṣṇa (Hindu deity)
    • us: Govinda (Hindu deity)
    • us: Mohan (Hindu deity)
    • us: Gopala (Hindu deity)
    • us: Bal Gopal (Hindu deity)
  • Additional Information

    • Descriptor

        Hindu deity
    • Descriptor

        (lcsh) Hindu gods
    • Birth Place

        (naf) India
    • Gender

        male
  • Use For

  • Exact Matching Concepts from Other Schemes

  • Sources

    • found: Reyes, E. Christopher. In His name, 2010: p. 307 (Christna, earlier English spelling of Krishna, who came upon earth to redeem man by his sufferings; Jesus and Krishna parallels)
    • found: Wikipedia, viewed November 12, 2014 (Krishna, also called Kr̥ṣṇa, Govinda, Mohan, and Gopala, is a deity, worshipped across many traditions of Hinduism. Many Vaishnava groups recognize him as an avatar of the god, Vishnu; however, some traditions within Krishnaism, consider Krishna to be svayam bhagavan, or the Supreme Being. Bhagavad gita and many other puranas considers that Krishna is source of all the vedas. Krishna belonged to the Vrishni clan of Yadavas from Mathura, and was the eighth son born to the princess Devaki, and her husband Vasudeva; Gopal; the child form of Krishna, also known as Bal Gopal)
  • Change Notes

    • 2015-07-22: new
    • 2015-11-06: revised
<<<<<---------->>>>>

Record in OCLC Connexion

010  no2015096049 Ç‚z sh 85073290 
040  CU-SB Ç‚b eng Ç‚e rda Ç‚c CU-SB Ç‚d MnSST Ç‚d DLC
1000 Krishna ǂc (Hindu deity)
368  Ç‚c Hindu deity
368  Ç‚c Hindu gods Ç‚2 lcsh
370  India Ç‚2 naf
375  male
4000 Christna ǂc (Hindu deity)
4000 Gopal ǂc (Hindu deity)
4000 Kr̥ṣṇa Ç‚c (Hindu deity)
4000 Govinda ǂc (Hindu deity)
4000 Mohan ǂc (Hindu deity)
4000 Gopala ǂc (Hindu deity)
4000 Bal Gopal ǂc (Hindu deity)
670  Reyes, E. Christopher. In His name, 2010: Ç‚b p. 307 (Christna, earlier English spelling of Krishna, who came upon earth to redeem man by his sufferings; Jesus and Krishna parallels)
670  Wikipedia, viewed November 12, 2014 Ç‚b (Krishna, also called Kr̥ṣṇa, Govinda, Mohan, and Gopala, is a deity, worshipped across many traditions of Hinduism. Many Vaishnava groups recognize him as an avatar of the god, Vishnu; however, some traditions within Krishnaism, consider Krishna to be svayam bhagavan, or the Supreme Being. Bhagavad gita and many other puranas considers that Krishna is source of all the vedas. Krishna belonged to the Vrishni clan of Yadavas from Mathura, and was the eighth son born to the princess Devaki, and her husband Vasudeva; Gopal; the child form of Krishna, also known as Bal Gopal)


<<<<<-----Revised on 2015-01-22----->>>>>

See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Conference Heading - Questions and Answers

RESOURCE DESCRIPTION & ACCESS RDA

Case: In a book title page reads like: Sustainable development in conflict environments: challenges and opportunities : proceedings of the international conference. 

Question: Should we give seminar access in cases like this?

Question: Is there any concept of capitalization of seminar name in RDA?

Answer: Suggested treatment is given below:

111 2_ |a Sustainable Development in Conflict Environments: Challenges and Opportunities (Conference) |d (2007 : |c Kathmandu, Nepal)
  • Regarding capitalization of named conferences, follow appendix A.2-->A10, etc. Basically they are the same rules as under AACR2.
  •  It can also be set up as: Sustainable development in conflict environments: challenges and opportunities (Conference)  Note the absence of quotation marks, i.e. transcribe what you see.
  • Determination should be if the conference is "named" or not, can be done by applying RDA 8.1.2 and 8.1.3