Sunday, June 23, 2013

GENERAL GUIDELINES ON TRANSCRIPTION

LC-PCC PS for 1.7.1 (RDA)


GENERAL GUIDELINES ON TRANSCRIPTION 

(Below is the Table of Contents; for complete text of this LC-PCC PS, click above)
  • Introduction 
LC practice/PCC practice: This Policy Statement is an overall statement related to punctuation/spacing conventions. For convenience, it addresses in one place conventions applicable to access points in bibliographic and name authority records and those applicable to other parts of the bibliographic record.
Much of the data in a MARC record are explicitly identified by content designation (tags, indicators, subfield codes). Upon output or display, the content designation is used to determine various display conventions including spacing. Internally there is often no spacing at all but instead content designation, particularly subfield codes. In displays that do not show content designation, spacing is substituted. How much spacing is at the discretion of a particular system. However, for data that are not subfielded (e.g, the constituent elements of a corporate name serving as a qualifier, the unsubfielded units in a linking entry field (hereafter "linking entry"), unsubfielded statements or data in MARC field 245), it is necessary to establish the spacing to be input. The computerized environment is oriented to a single-space convention throughout authority and bibliographic records.
Note that some systems display a space on either side of a subfield code to aid the comprehension of subfielded data. Such "spaces" are also a function of display, i.e., they are not carried internally. In the examples in this policy statement, no spaces are used on either side of a MARC subfield code to insure that there is no confusion about the spacing convention being illustrated.
  • Access Points in Name Authority and Bibliographic Records (General)
1. Punctuation/spacing within access points.
a) Spaces following periods.
b) Punctuation preceding the name of a language in authorized access points of works or expressions. 
c) Ampersand.
d) Parenthesis. 
e) Quotation mark. 
f) Open date. 
2. Ending mark of punctuation.
a) Name authority records. 
b) Bibliographic records. 
  • Access Points for Persons in Name Authority and Bibliographic Records
1. Initials/letters

2. Abbreviated or missing portions of preferred names.

3. Prefixes (articles and prepositions) in certain names.

4. Subfield $i (Relationship information) in authority records.

5. Bibliographic description.
  • Access Points for Corporate Names, Including Meetings, in Name Authority and Bibliographic Records
1. Quotation marks.

2. Initials.

3. Abbreviations

4. Place name at end.

5. Subfield $i (Relationship information) in authority records.
  • Bibliographic Linking Entries
  • Punctuation at the End of MARC Fields 245, 246-247, 250, 264, 300, 310/321, 362, 490
  • Punctuation in Subfields $3 in MARC Fields 264, 490
  • Punctuation in Subfield $x in MARC 8XX Fields
  • Punctuation in Notes
1. Additional information expected.

2. Ending mark of punctuation (5XX).

3. Square brackets
  • Temporary/Uncertain Data

    [Source: Based on information from RDA Toolkit]

<<<<<---------->>>>>

Access Points for Persons in Name Authority and Bibliographic Records

LC practice/PCC practice:

1. Initials/letters
a) Name portion of authorized access point
i) Periods. If the name of a person consists of or contains initials, input a period after an initial if it is certain that the letter is an initial. In case of doubt, do not input a period. If the name consists of separate letters that are presumed not to be initials, omit or include periods according to the predominant usage of the person.

EXAMPLE
100 1#$aEliot, T. S.
100 0#$aH. D.
100 0#$aX Y Z
ii)
Spaces. If the name contains two or more forenames represented by initials, consists entirely of initials, or consists entirely of separate letters that are not initials, input a single space between the initials/letters in all cases (regardless of whether they are followed by periods or not).

EXAMPLE
100 1#$aEliot, T. S.
100 0#$aH. D.
100 0#$aX Y Z
b)
Other elements in authorized access point
i)
Periods. With initials, include periods unless the author’s predominant usage makes it clear that the author omits them.
ii)
Spaces. Do not leave spaces between single initials/letters.

EXAMPLE
100 0#$aAngela,$cSister, O.S.B.
2. Abbreviated or missing portions of preferred names. If a part of a preferred name is abbreviated (two or more letters present as opposed to a single letter used as an initial) or if a forename is missing from a name entered under surname, do not leave open space after the abbreviation or missing forename. Instead, insert, as appropriate,

EXAMPLE
a period
100 1#$aTissot
Add period at end in bibliographic record, but not in authority record
100 1#$aCorpeleijn, W. F. Th.
100 1#$aJunager, Sv.-Aa.
a period and one space
100 1#$aEnschedé, Ch. J.
a period and a comma
100 1#$aJones, Th.,$d1910-
100 1#$aCalles Ll., Alfonso
100 1#$aDahlan Aman, Mohd.,$cHaji
For these names, add a period at end in bibliographic record, but not in authority record
3. Prefixes (articles and prepositions) in certain names. Once authorized and variant access points for a person have been determined according to RDA 9.2.2.11 and RDA 9.2.3.10, use the following guidelines in encoding the constituent parts of the authorized and variant access points. Apply these guidelines, as appropriate, to authorized and variant access points in a name authority record and to authorized access points (including subjects) in a bibliographic record. In the examples used in the guidelines, only the germane variants have been shown.
a)
Prefix immediately follows the first element. If the first element of an authorized or variant access point for a person is followed directly by a prefix without intervening data (e.g., forename(s), name(s) serving the function of a forename as in the case of certain Portuguese names, forename initial(s)), separate the prefix from the first element by a comma and place the prefix, etc., in the MARC record as part of the $c subfield, the subfield for words and phrases associated with the authorized or variant access point. The purpose of this practice is to prevent prefixes from being treated as forenames.

EXAMPLE
100 1#$aWalle-Lissnijder,$cvan de
400 1#$aLissnijder,$cvan de Walle
400 1#$aVan de Walle-Lissnijder
400 1#$aWalle-Lissnijder, Edm. van de
100 1#$aDe Sanctis
400 1#$aSanctis,$cDe
100 1#$aCordemoy, Géraud de,$d-1864
400 1#$aFourneillis,$cdes,$d-1684
100 1#$aDiego O., Carlos A. de
400 1#$aDiego,$cde
b)
Prefixes in names lacking forenames but containing words or phrases associated with an authorized or variant access point. Formulate such authorized or variant access points with the prefixes following any words or phrases associated with the name.

EXAMPLE
100 1#$aWinter,$cDoctor de
400 0#$aDoctor de Winter
100 1#$aL'Epée, Charles-Michel de,$d1712-1789
400 1#$aL'Epée,$cabbé de$q(Charles-Michel),$d1712-1789
100 1#$aLa Fayette,$cMadame de$q(Marie-Madelaine Pioche de La Vergne),$d1634-1693
400 1#$aLaFayette,$cMadame de$q(Marie-Madelaine Pioche de La Vergne),$d1634-1693
400 1#$aFayette,$cMadame de La$q(Marie-Madelaine Pioche de La Vergne),$d1634-1693
400 1#$aDe La Fayette,$cMadame$q(Marie-Madelaine Pioche de La Vergne),$d1634-1693
400 0#$aMadame de La Fayette$q(Marie-Madelaine Pioche de La Vergne),$d1634-1693
c)
Names in category b. above that include qualifications. Formulate the data constituting the authorized or variant access points according to the pattern: first element of the authorized or variant access point, words or phrases associated with the name ($c subfield), prefix, qualifier, date.

EXAMPLE
100 1#$aLettow-Vorbeck,$cGeneral von$q(Paul Emil),$d1870-1964
400 1#$aVorbeck, Lettow,$cGeneral von$q(Paul Emil),$d1870-1964
400 1#$aLettow-Vorbeck,$cColonel von$q(Paul Emil),$d1870-1964
400 1#$aVon Lettow-Vorbeck,$cGeneral$q(Paul Emil),$d1870-1964
100 1#$aGatti de Gamond,$cMadame$q(Zoé Charlotte),$d1812-1854
400 1#$aDe Gamond, Gatti,$cMadame$q(Zoé Charlotte),$d1812-1854
400 1#$aGamond, Gatti de,$cMadame$q(Zoé Charlotte),$d1812-1854
100 1#$aSigaud de La Fond,$c M.$q(Joseph Aignan),$d1730-1810
400 1#$aDe La Fond, Sigaud,$cM.$q(Joseph Aignan),$d 1730-1810
400 1#$aLa Fond, Sigaud de,$cM.$q(Joseph Aignan),$d1730-1810
400 1#$aFond, Sigaud de La,$cM.$q(Joseph Aignan),$d1730-1810
4. Subfield $i (Relationship information) in authority records. When subfield $i for relationship designator is used in a 5XX field, begin the field with subfield $w r. Give subfield $i as the second subfield; the first word in the relationship designator is capitalized, and the subfield ends with a colon.

EXAMPLE
110 2#$aI.M. Pei Associates
500 1#$wr$iFounder:$aPei, I. M.,$d1917-
5. Bibliographic description. Note that the spacing and punctuation conventions applied to personal names used in access points may differ from those used in the descriptive portion of a bibliographic record.



See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Monday, June 17, 2013

Selections and Translations Example

RDA Example of Selections and Translations.

CASE: Compilations of selected devotional songs of a Kannada saint poet; with Hindi and English translations.



See also another example: https://lccn.loc.gov/2015363552


TIP OF THE DAY

Whenever we recode an AACR2 NAR to RDA, we should also re-evaluate the record (especially the heading) to see if anything needs to be revised.



Example of a Language Note

[546] In Hindi, Kannada ‡b (in Devanagari), and English.



Order of subfields k and l in Preferred Titles

QUESTION: What is order of subfields k and l in preferred titles. 
For example $t Plays. $k Selections. $l Hindi.

ANSWER: Under RDA it has been determined that $k Selections is an attribute of a work and language ($l) is an attribute of an expression.  So $k must preceed $l

[Answer provided by Ana Lupe Cristán]



<<<----->>>>
 

EXAMPLE: For selected plays of a Panjabi author, translated into Hindi:
[240]-10 ‡a Plays. ‡k Selections. ‡l Hindi.


Publication Date and Copyright Date

If the record has both the publication and copyright dates, then the 008/06 should be "t" and the 008/11-14 should have the copyright date. See LC-PCC PS 2.8.6.6 for examples. 

LC-PCC PS for 2.8.6.6 -- DATE OF PUBLICATION NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE RESOURCE


<<<<<---------->>>>>


DtSt Type of Date/Publication Status (OCLC MARC BIBLIOGRAPHIC)


t Publication date and copyright date. The item has a publication, release or production date and a copyright date. Date 1 is the year of publication, release, or production; Date 2, the year of copyright. Treat deposit dates (preceded by D.L.) as copyright dates.
DtSt:t
Dates:1966, 1962
[1966, c1962 ( 1968 printing )] 
DtSt:t
Dates:1966,1965
[1966, c1965] 
DtSt:t
Dates:1980,1957
[1980 printing, c1957] 
DtSt:t
Dates:198u,1979
260Berlin : ‡b Springer, ‡c [198-?], c1979.
DtSt:t
Dates:1982,1949
260London : ‡b Macmillan, ‡c 1982, c1949.

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Serials' editor

Resource Description & Access (RDA)

RDA Rule 2.4.1 instructs to record a statement of responsibility identifying an editor of a serial only if the name of the editor is considered to be an important means of identifying the serial.



Identifyin​g Original and Translatio​n in same resource

RESOURCE DESCRIPTION & ACCESS RDA

QUESTION:

This is in regards to 2011352604, which contains both the original text in Sanskrit and the Hindi translation. In AACR2, we would have had a 240 of Kalyāṇakāraka. $l Hindi & Sanskrit. In RDA, we would not have a 240. Instead, in theory, we would give 2 700s (as in the Mail Carrier example from the class materials):

700 02 ‡a Ugrādityācārya, ‡d 8th/9th century. ‡t Kalyāṇakāraka.
700 02 ‡a Ugrādityācārya, ‡d 8th/9th century. ‡t Kalyāṇakāraka. ‡l Hindi.

However, in this case, the 1st 700 would really result in the same N/T string as the 100/245 combo. So is it still required?

ANSWER:

Yes, two 700 name/title analytics.   In some cases the preferred title may be the same as the 245 title proper, but in many other cases it won't be.  We just thought it would always be easier to say "make the analytics" than to say "sometimes you do, and sometimes you don’t".  So it may be redundant in some cases.

(Reproduction of suggestions of experts on RDA)


<<<<<---------->>>>>

RDA Blog : RDA Blog is a blog on Resource Description and Access (RDA), a new library cataloging standard that provides instructions and guidelines on formulating data for resource description and discovery, organized based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), intended for use by libraries and other cultural organizations replacing Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (AACR2). This blog lists description and links to resources on Resource Description & Access (RDA). It is an attempt to bring together at one place all the useful and important information, rules, references, news, and links on Resource Description and AccessFRBRFRADFRSADMARC standardsAACR2BIBFRAME, and other items related to current developments and trends in library cataloging practice.

RDA Blog History: RDA Blog was created by Salman Haider, a Cataloging & Metadata Librarian Blogger & Online Social Media Expert from India. RDA Blog embarked on its journey to provide useful information to Resource Description and Access (RDA) in August 2011. It received good response from librarians, catalogers, and library professionals from all around the world. It is interesting to note that the first hundred thousand pageviews to RDA Blog came in 3 years, but it took just 8 months to reach another hundred thousand pageviews. At present it is viewed at a rate of fifteen to twenty thousand times per month. RDA Blog is widely followed in social media.

See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Revisions to CSM due to RDA

The Classification and Shelflisting Manual (CSM) contains the policies on assigning LC classification numbers and LC book numbers (i.e., shelflisting).  Originally written in the 1980s and last updated in 2010, the CSM reflects the AACR2 environment.  

The U.S. national libraries’ decision to implement Resource Description and Access (RDA) led the Policy and Standards Division (PSD) to review the CSM and determine which instruction sheets needed to be revised to reflect RDA instructions.  Generally, the text was updated to ensure consistency with past classification and shelflisting practice, and new examples were chosen.

Specialists in PSD also took this opportunity to reevaluate some long-standing practices both to simplify them and to make them more sustainable in today’s linked, global, environment.  

The priority was to first revise the instruction sheets that are most heavily affected by the implementation of RDA. Those sheets are now provided as PDFs on the ABA website at http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/csm_instruction_sheets.html.  PSD will also post additional instruction sheets there as the revisions are completed.  

PSD is planning staff briefings on the policy changes, the times and dates of which will be announced in the coming days. 

The brief descriptions of significant policy changes provided below are intended for guidance only.  The full instruction sheets should be consulted for instructions and examples. 

F 175               Editions      The instructions for classifying simultaneously published editions were clarified.  

F 632               Literary Authors      Individual literary authors born before 1925 and anonymous literary works published before 1925 must now be printed in the schedule (i.e., numbers must be proposed for them). The cutoff dates had been 1870 and 1899, respectively.      A section was added to clarify the classification of criticism and commentaries about an individual author’s works.

F 633               Literary Authors: Subarrangement of Works      Compilations are no longer classified either as collections or as separate works based on whether the author is still living.  Instead, the assignment of an RDA conventional collective title is now the sole determinant.      The caption Selections, which is used frequently in the literary author tables, will be revised to Selections. Extracts. Passages in order to clarify the distinction between Selected works and Selections.  

F 634               Literary Collections      The treatment of a literary collection versus a collection in which one of the works is predominant was clarified.

G 140              Dates      The examples of date formats were updated to reflect RDA instructions.      Policy on the use of work letters was revised.  New editions of works entered under corporate body should be assigned work letters beginning with b if necessary, to distinguish between editions published in the same year.  This change makes the policy for corporate bodies consistent with the policy for works entered under a personal name or title. [The instruction to use the workmark a for serials was not changed.] 

G 150              Translations      Several languages were added to the Translation Table.      Polyglot was redefined to mean that there are two or more translations present within a resource (previously, three translations were necessary).      The Cuttering practice for translations in which the language is not listed in the Translation Table was revised. Instead of repurposing a Cutter extension in the Table, the language should be assigned a unique Cutter extension.

(Source: PSD-LC)


See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

LCSH revisions due to RDA Phase 2 revisions

The RDA Phase 2 changes to the name authority file were completed on March 27, 2013, so the Library of Congress’ Policy and Standards Division will now begin to update LCSH authority records.  PSD expects to complete the project by the end of April 2013.

Personal, corporate, and conference names, as well as titles and geographic headings (MARC 21 fields 100, 110, 111, 130, and 151), that are established in the name authority file and are also printed in LCSH are eligible for revision.  Phrase headings and subdivisions that are based on names or titles (e.g., Food in the Koran; Future life—Koranic teaching) will also be revised as necessary.

This is a large project that must be undertaken in a systematic manner in order to find all of the affected records.  LC catalogers and SACO participants are therefore requested to refrain from making proposals to update headings until after PSD announces the completion of the project.  

At this time, PSD is not planning a wholesale revision to those LC subject headings that include abbreviations that are not permitted in RDA, which chiefly appear in a subfield $y (e.g., Egypt—History—Early Dynastic Period, ca. 3100-ca. 2686 B.C.). 

(Source: PSD, LC)


See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

RDA Policies for Library of Congress

LC policies for a few topics recently discussed by the ABA Management Team.  These policies either confirm that the interim policies LC staff have been following are still in place, or note where policies will be different in the post-March period.

The topics covered are:

Policy 1:  RDA Acceptable Authority Records after March 31, 2013
Policy 2:  Monographs Imported from OCLC (including copy cataloging)
Policy 3:  CIP Verification
Policy 4:  Working with Existing Serial Records
Policy 5: Added Volumes for Multipart Monographs
Policy 6:  Manual Hybridization of AACR2 Records with RDA Elements

All staff involved with creating and updating LC/NACO authority records should pay particular attention to Policy 1 on the treatment of authority records. Policies 2-6 are primarily applicable to ABA and other processing units choosing to follow them.  

These policies are also posted at http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/rda-policies-for-lc.pdf 

Phase 2 Changes to the LC/NACO Authority FileAlso note that the Phase 2 changes to the LC/NACO authority file were completed this week-- 371,942 records were updated as part of this process.  Should you encounter one of these revised headings in your normal work, please use the new authorized form in your bibliographic record.  A similar automated change is being planned for updating headings in bibliographic records, but until this process is complete, headings will be out of synchronization between the authority record and bibliographic records.  Until the automated changes to bibliographic records are complete, it is not necessary to perform bibliographic file maintenance on existing bibliographic records, nor report the discrepancies to PSD.

Questions on these policies may be sent to LChelp4RDA@loc.gov

Acronyms as variants in RDA NARs

RESOURCE DESCRIPTION & ACCESS RDA

QUESTION:

Would the same rules for qualifying a corporate body apply to both the heading and the variants? For example, would this be appropriate under RDA:
110 2_ Progressive Artists Group (Jaipur, India)
410 2_ PAG (Jaipur, India)
We would never qualified "PAG" under AACR2 when it's used as a variant form. When it's used as a heading, of course, then we would qualify. What about in RDA?

ANSWER:

We had a very specific LCRI practice that basically forbade the adding of qualifiers to many kinds of references, we got rid of those restrictions on variants because they represented an exception that wasn't really important and only caused confusion. 11.13.2.1 tells you that you can add the same additions to variants as to authorized access points.

For personal names see RDA Rule 9.19.2.1

(Reproduction of Question and Answer from experts from LC)



<<<<<---------->>>>>


RDA Rule 11.13.2.1 : General Guidelines on Constructing Variant Access Points to Represent Corporate Bodies [This rule suggests to Make additions to the name, if considered important for identification]:

  • Addition to a Name Not Conveying the Idea of a Corporate Body 
  • Place Associated with the Body
  • Associated Institution
  • Date Associated with the Body
  • Type of Jurisdiction
  • Other Designation Associated with the Body
  • Number, Date, and Location of a Conference, Etc.

RDA Rule 9.19.2.1 : General Guidelines on Constructing Variant Access Points to Represent Persons

[Revised on 2015-06-18]

See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):