Showing posts with label INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND AND HISTORY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND AND HISTORY. Show all posts

Thursday, July 25, 2013

RDA STRUCTURE

RDA is divided into ten sections: sections 1–4 cover elements corresponding to the entity attributes defined in FRBR and FRAD; sections 5–10 cover elements corresponding to the relationships defined in FRBR and FRAD.

The initial chapter in each section sets out the functional objectives and principles underlying the guidelines and instructions in that section, and specifies core elements to support those functional objectives.

Subsequent chapters within each section cover attributes or relationships that support a specific user task as follows:

Attributes

Section 1 covers the attributes of manifestations and items that are most commonly used to identify a resource (chapter 2), to select a resource appropriate to the user’s requirements with respect to format and encoding (chapter 3), and to obtain a resource (chapter 4). 
Section 2 covers the attributes of works and expressions that are most commonly used to identify a work or expression (chapter 6), and to select a work or expression appropriate to the user’s requirements with respect to content (chapter 7). 
Section 3 covers the attributes of persons (chapter 9), families (chapter 10), and corporate bodies (chapter 11) that are most commonly used to identify those entities. 
Section 4 covers the attributes of concepts (chapter 13), objects (chapter 14), events (chapter 15), and places (chapter 16) that are most commonly used to identify those entities.

Relationships

Section 5 covers the primary relationships between a work, expression, manifestation, and item (chapter 17).

Section 6 covers the relationships that are used to find works (chapter 19), expressions (chapter 20), manifestations (chapter 21), and items (chapter 22) associated with a particular person, family, or corporate body.

Section 7 covers the relationships that are used to find works on a particular subject (chapter 23).

Section 8 covers the relationships that are used to find related works (chapter 25), related expressions (chapter 26), related manifestations (chapter 27), and related items (chapter 28).

Section 9 covers the relationships that are used to find related persons (chapter 30), related families (chapter 31), and related corporate bodies (chapter 32).

Section 10 covers the relationships that are used to find related concepts (chapter 34), objects (chapter 35), events (chapter 36), and places (chapter 37).

Supplementary guidelines and instructions are provided in appendices as follows:

Appendix A provides guidelines on capitalization for English and a selected number of other languages. The appendix includes guidelines that apply to elements that require transcription and to elements that are recorded.

Appendix B provides instructions on the use of abbreviations when recording specified elements and on using symbols instead of abbreviations, when appropriate. It includes lists of abbreviations in English and a selected number of other languages.

Appendix C lists articles to be omitted when applying the alternative instructions for titles for works and names of persons, corporate bodies, and places. The initial articles are listed by language.

Appendix D provides mappings of RDA data elements used to describe a resource to a selected number of related metadata schemes for encoding or presentation of resource description data (e.g., ISBD, MARC 21).

Appendix E provides mappings of RDA data elements used to describe an entity associated with a resource to a selected number of related metadata schemes for encoding or presentation of access point and authority data (e.g., AACR2, MARC 21).

Appendix F provides instructions on choosing and recording names of persons in a number of specific languages, supplementing the general guidelines and instructions in chapter 9.

Appendix G  provides information on titles of nobility, terms of rank, etc., used in a number of specific jurisdictions.

Appendix H  provides information on recording dates in the Christian calendar.

Appendix I lists terms used as designators to indicate the nature of a relationship between a resource and a person, family, or corporate body associated with that resource. The relationship designators define the relationship more specifically than the relationship element by itself. The appendix provides definitions for terms used as relationship designators and instructions on their use.

Appendix J lists terms used as designators to indicate the nature of a relationship between works, expressions, manifestations, and items. The relationship designators define the relationship more specifically than the relationship element by itself. The appendix provides definitions for terms used as relationship designators and instructions on their use.

Appendix K lists terms used as designators to indicate the nature of a relationship between persons, families, and corporate bodies. The relationship designators define the relationship more specifically than the relationship element by itself. The appendix provides definitions for terms used as relationship designators and instructions on their use.

Appendix L lists terms used as designators to indicate the nature of a relationship between concepts, objects, events, and places. The relationship designators define the relationship more specifically than the relationship element by itself. The appendix provides definitions for terms used as relationship designators and instructions on their use.

[Source: Based on information from RDA Toolkit]


See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Saturday, June 8, 2013

RDA Policies for Library of Congress

LC policies for a few topics recently discussed by the ABA Management Team.  These policies either confirm that the interim policies LC staff have been following are still in place, or note where policies will be different in the post-March period.

The topics covered are:

Policy 1:  RDA Acceptable Authority Records after March 31, 2013
Policy 2:  Monographs Imported from OCLC (including copy cataloging)
Policy 3:  CIP Verification
Policy 4:  Working with Existing Serial Records
Policy 5: Added Volumes for Multipart Monographs
Policy 6:  Manual Hybridization of AACR2 Records with RDA Elements

All staff involved with creating and updating LC/NACO authority records should pay particular attention to Policy 1 on the treatment of authority records. Policies 2-6 are primarily applicable to ABA and other processing units choosing to follow them.  

These policies are also posted at http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/rda-policies-for-lc.pdf 

Phase 2 Changes to the LC/NACO Authority FileAlso note that the Phase 2 changes to the LC/NACO authority file were completed this week-- 371,942 records were updated as part of this process.  Should you encounter one of these revised headings in your normal work, please use the new authorized form in your bibliographic record.  A similar automated change is being planned for updating headings in bibliographic records, but until this process is complete, headings will be out of synchronization between the authority record and bibliographic records.  Until the automated changes to bibliographic records are complete, it is not necessary to perform bibliographic file maintenance on existing bibliographic records, nor report the discrepancies to PSD.

Questions on these policies may be sent to LChelp4RDA@loc.gov

Monday, November 26, 2012

Introducing RDA


Introducing RDA from ALATechSource


Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Second Opportunity for Introducing RDA - A Workshop with Chris Oliver!

Second Opportunity for Introducing RDA - A Workshop with Chris Oliver!

<<<<<---------->>>>>

RDA Blog : RDA Blog is a blog on Resource Description and Access (RDA), a new library cataloging standard that provides instructions and guidelines on formulating data for resource description and discovery, organized based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), intended for use by libraries and other cultural organizations replacing Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (AACR2). This blog lists description and links to resources on Resource Description & Access (RDA). It is an attempt to bring together at one place all the useful and important information, rules, references, news, and links on Resource Description and AccessFRBRFRADFRSADMARC standardsAACR2BIBFRAME, and other items related to current developments and trends in library cataloging practice.

RDA Blog History: RDA Blog was created by Salman Haider, a Cataloging & Metadata Librarian Blogger & Online Social Media Expert from India. RDA Blog embarked on its journey to provide useful information to Resource Description and Access (RDA) in August 2011. It received good response from librarians, catalogers, and library professionals from all around the world. It is interesting to note that the first hundred thousand pageviews to RDA Blog came in 3 years, but it took just 8 months to reach another hundred thousand pageviews. At present it is viewed at a rate of fifteen to twenty thousand times per month. RDA Blog is widely followed in social media.

See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Thursday, October 27, 2011

LC Cataloging Staff Involved in US RDA Test to Resume RDA Cataloging in November 2011

To help LC in carrying out its responsibilities for (1) the ongoing development of RDA, and (2) the creation and/or revision of training materials supporting documentation for LC, PCC, and the U.S. library community, most of the LC cataloging staff who participated in the U.S. RDA Test will return to using RDA for cataloging starting in November 2011. Documents identifying changes in LC policies from those followed during the U.S. RDA Test and refresher training materials prepared for LC’s RDA cataloging staff will be posted on LC’s web site for preparation for RDA (http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/).

[21 October 2011]

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Rewording of RDA: Resource Description and Access

At its August 24 meeting, the Committee of Principals requested that ALA Publishing on behalf of the Co-Publishers of RDA: Resource Description and Access work with the JSC and the U.S Test Committee to formulate a plan for the rewording of RDA and to define the role of the copy editor.
Today the Co-Publishers are releasing "The Plan for the Rewording of RDA and the Role of the Copy Editor". The statement details the editorial steps necessary to reword RDA and sets a goal of submitting five chapters for review by the JSC and then the U.S Test Committee no later than June 2012.
The search to identify a copy editor with the knowledge and skills to take on this assignment is underway. More details about the copy editor and the rewording plan will be shared as soon as they become available. 
(Source: RDA Toolkit)


See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

RDA in Europe (documents and presentations)


RDA in France

RDA in Europe: making it happen! EURIG-JSC seminar on RDA (8 Aug 2010, Royal Library, Copenhagen, Denmark)

General

All documents are in PDF.

Presentations

Presentations are in PDF and/or PPS.
  • RDA in BNE / Mar Hernández Agustí [PDF] [PPS]
  • RDA future development: governance, participation and future change / Caroline Brazier [PDF] [PPS]
  • A long and winding road: RDA from principles to practice / Alan Danskin [PDF] [PPS]
  • German translation issues / Christine Frodl [PDF] [PPS]
  • Germany on track for international standards: RDA / Renate Gömpel [PPS]
  • RDA in Finland / Tuula Haapamäki [PDF] [PPS]
  • French libraries moving to RDA? Key issues / Françoise Leresche & Françoise Bourdon [PPS]
  • RDA in Europe: making it happen : summary of presentations by European countries on plans for moving to RDA [PDF] [PPS]
  • Translating RDA / Margaret Stewart [PDF] [PPS]
  • RDA and plans: Australia, Canada, UK, & US / Barbara B. Tillett [PDF] [PPS]
  • The US RDA test / Beacher Wiggins [PDF] [PPS]

<<<<<---------->>>>>

RDA Blog : RDA Blog is a blog on Resource Description and Access (RDA), a new library cataloging standard that provides instructions and guidelines on formulating data for resource description and discovery, organized based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), intended for use by libraries and other cultural organizations replacing Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (AACR2). This blog lists description and links to resources on Resource Description & Access (RDA). It is an attempt to bring together at one place all the useful and important information, rules, references, news, and links on Resource Description and AccessFRBRFRADFRSADMARC standardsAACR2BIBFRAME, and other items related to current developments and trends in library cataloging practice.

RDA Blog History: RDA Blog was created by Salman Haider, a Cataloging & Metadata Librarian Blogger & Online Social Media Expert from India. RDA Blog embarked on its journey to provide useful information to Resource Description and Access (RDA) in August 2011. It received good response from librarians, catalogers, and library professionals from all around the world. It is interesting to note that the first hundred thousand pageviews to RDA Blog came in 3 years, but it took just 8 months to reach another hundred thousand pageviews. At present it is viewed at a rate of fifteen to twenty thousand times per month. RDA Blog is widely followed in social media.

See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

RDA at Library of Congress

The Policy and Standards Division, part of the Acquisitions and Bibliographic Access Directorate at the Library of Congress, is launching a new website as the Library prepares for RDA.  The site is located at: http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/.  There are links to training documents, presentations, exercises, and examples of records as well as to other RDA related sites.  Many more links will be added as items are created, edited, and updated as preparations for RDA proceed.  The page originally created for LC documentation related to the US RDA Test will no longer be maintained.  Links from that site will be migrated to the new site over time as appropriate.




See also:


Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Sunday, August 28, 2011

ALA 2011: Some RDA news

News from ALA Conference held in 2011

ALA Conference for RDA and RDA toolkit. The U.S. RDA Test Committee met with vendors, testers, and the public, and summarized the results of the test and the reasoning behind their recent decision. The U.S. RDA Test Committee stated that the "rewrite" of RDA will actually be more of a rewording, intended to simplify and clarify some of the instructions. Cataloging practice will not be affected by the rewording. We also learned that the Library of Congress will begin partial RDA Cataloging in November. They will catalog across all subject areas and expect RDA records to represent about 5% of the library's cataloging output. The National Library of Medicine and the National Agricultural Library will not catalog in RDA until full implementation begins.

Source: ALA 2011: Some RDA news

See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

OCLC policy on RDA

OCLC Policy on Resource Description and Access (RDA)

OCLC policy statement on RDA Cataloging in WorldCat for the U.S. testing period and beyond


With the installation of capabilities as described in Technical Bulletin 258, OCLC has now implemented most of the MARC 21 format changes for initial support of RDA: Resource Description & Access. OCLC has also implemented links to the RDA toolkit for toolkit subscribers in the Connexion Browser and in Connexion Client 2.3. In the U.S., the Library of Congress, the National Agricultural Library, and the National Library of Medicine coordinated a test that involved those institutions and a group of additional institutions selected from the broader U.S. library community. More information about the testing process can be found on the Library of Congress web site.

The timeline for the testing included a 90-day period in which testing participants familiarized themselves with the content of RDA and the RDA toolkit, a 2nd 90-day period in which the testing participants produced records, and a 3rd 90-day period in which the Steering Committee for the testing evaluated the results and produced its report. That report has now been shared with the wider library community. Widespread adoption of RDA within the U.S. is not expected now until January 2013 or later. OCLC is committed to supporting OCLC members who wish to implement RDA in their libraries but will not require that all libraries adopt RDA.

Many of the institutions that participated in the testing are OCLC member libraries and have added RDA-based records to WorldCat, either online through Connexion or through batchloading. OCLC cataloging members who are not testing participants also have tried RDA Cataloging. Some RDA test participants, including the Library of Congress plan to continue cataloging using RDA with some or all of their cataloging production until the implementation date. OCLC urges that cataloging staff members take time to become familiar with the content and use of RDA before beginning the creation of RDA records. Library of Congress staff have made available a variety of training materials that will help in the familiarization process.
Until further notice, OCLC asks that the following protocols be respected by OCLC member libraries:
  • Catalogers may contribute original cataloging using RDA to WorldCat if desired. (040 $e with value rda and Leader/18 (Desc) coded i if ISBD punctuation is used or blank if not).
  • For materials other than continuing resources, catalogers are asked NOT to edit a WorldCat full-level master record (ELvl values blank148I, and L) to change it from one set of rules to another. In other words, if the record was created according to AACR2 (and coded as such), please do not change the master record to RDA. If the record was created according to RDA (and coded as such), please do not change the master record to AACR2.
  • For records describing continuing resources, a cataloger may change a record from AACR2 (or earlier rules) to RDA as part of the process of updating information in the record. Once the record has been changed to RDA, please do not change it back to AACR2.
  • If a record is a minimal-level or less than minimal-level record (ELvl values KM235, and 7), a cataloger may change the record from AACR2 to RDA as a part of the process of upgrading the record to full-level (ELvl values blank14, and I,). As in the previous bullet, please do not change it back to AACR2 once it has been upgraded and changed to RDA.
  • If an existing record is not coded as following either AACR2 or RDA (i.e. coded blank or i in Leader/18 (Desc) and 040 $e is not present), a cataloger may edit the master record to follow either AACR2 or RDA when upgrading the record.
  • When performing copy cataloging, catalogers may LOCALLY edit records created under any rules to another set of rules. Please do NOT replace the master record for this purpose (unless upgrading as outlined in the previous 2 bullets).
  • If a record created according to either AACR2 or RDA already exists in WorldCat, please do NOT create a duplicate record according to the other code. Such duplicates are not within the scope of the OCLC policy on parallel records and OCLC staff will merge them if found.
These protocols, which applied for the duration of the nine month RDA test period, continue to apply until further notice. OCLC will reconsider this policy during the remainder of 2011 and will seek comment from the OCLC membership on how widespread implementation could affect WorldCat before making policy decisions going forward.

(Source: OCLC website, June 2011)

<<<<<---------->>>>>

RDA Blog : RDA Blog is a blog on Resource Description and Access (RDA), a new library cataloging standard that provides instructions and guidelines on formulating data for resource description and discovery, organized based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), intended for use by libraries and other cultural organizations replacing Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (AACR2). This blog lists description and links to resources on Resource Description & Access (RDA). It is an attempt to bring together at one place all the useful and important information, rules, references, news, and links on Resource Description and AccessFRBRFRADFRSADMARC standardsAACR2BIBFRAME, and other items related to current developments and trends in library cataloging practice.

RDA Blog History: RDA Blog was created by Salman Haider, a Cataloging & Metadata Librarian Blogger & Online Social Media Expert from India. RDA Blog embarked on its journey to provide useful information to Resource Description and Access (RDA) in August 2011. It received good response from librarians, catalogers, and library professionals from all around the world. It is interesting to note that the first hundred thousand pageviews to RDA Blog came in 3 years, but it took just 8 months to reach another hundred thousand pageviews. At present it is viewed at a rate of fifteen to twenty thousand times per month. RDA Blog is widely followed in social media.

See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):